City of Rosemount Built to Play overview board with Central Park expansion, Erickson Park, ice arena, UMore ball field and playgrounds

Rosemount Can Now Borrow Up to $75M for Built to Play. Here's What That Does (and Doesn't) Mean

TLDR

  • The Rosemount City Council voted 4-0 on Oct. 20, 2026 to create Industrial Development District No. 2 and pass Ordinance 2026-06.
  • That lets the Rosemount Port Authority borrow up to $75 million for Built to Play. Current costs are estimated at $62.6 million.
  • No bonds were sold, and no designs were finalized.
  • About 14 residents spoke, and opinions were split.

The Rosemount City Council just gave the green light to the money side of Built to Play. At its packed Oct. 20, 2026 meeting, the council voted 4-0 to let the Rosemount Port Authority borrow up to $75 million for new ice rinks, ball fields and park upgrades. Whether you're cheering or fuming, here's what actually passed.

What Passed (and What Didn't)

The council did three things in one motion:

Map of Industrial Development District No. 2 showing five Built to Play park project sites in Rosemount
Source: City of Rosemount, Oct. 20, 2026 council packet
  • It created Industrial Development District No. 2. Think of it as a zone on a map where the Port Authority can use special powers under Minnesota's industrial development district law. All five Built to Play project areas sit inside it.
  • It adopted a development plan for that zone.
  • It passed Ordinance 2026-06, which lets the Port Authority issue up to $75 million in general obligation bonds. Those are loans paid back with property taxes.

The Port Authority already approved its part earlier that same evening. Council Member Paul Essler made the motion and Council Member Heidi Freske seconded it.

Here's what it did not do. "There is no resolution or motion before the council that would suggest that you are issuing bonds this evening," the city's bond advisor from Northland Securities said. Klimpel called the vote "a nerdy step, like a framework."

Why $62.6M, $69M and $75M?

There are a lot of numbers flying around. Here's the breakdown:

  • $62.6 million is the current estimate for construction and equipment. None of it has been bid.
  • About $69 million adds bond fees and some interest set aside up front to ease the tax hit.
  • $75 million is the legal cap. It gives room if costs move, so the city doesn't have to redo the ordinance.

The plan is three bond sales in 2027, 2028 and 2029. The first could be set up as early as February. The Port Authority can borrow without a public vote, and its debt doesn't count against the city's debt limit.

What Gets Built First

Parks Director Dan Schultz said the designs are still "schematic." That means colored concept drawings, not final plans. Here's his rough order:

Grow Your Business With Us

Own a local south metro business?

We help Dakota & Scott County businesses reach local readers. Takes 30 seconds.

Yes β€” tell me more
Conceptual site plan for a Rosemount two-sheet ice arena with parking and two ball fields by JLG Architects
Rendering: JLG Architects via City of Rosemount. Conceptual, not final design.
  1. Rosemount's first full-size baseball field, at UMore
  2. The two-sheet ice arena
  3. Turning the old public works garage into an event space
  4. Central Park upgrades and new playgrounds, spread over about five years

The Erickson Park rebuild will be phased. Its five fields are used every weekend from May to October. The rink will use a "construction manager at risk," a builder hired early to help design and control costs. Here's our story on the RJM Construction hire for the indoor ice project.

The Hearing: "Anti-Democratic" vs. "It's Called an Election"

Against: Several speakers said they like parks but hate the process. Pam VanderWeele called it an "anti-democratic process" and "a blank check." Brian Conley argued that parks aren't really "industrial development" under state law. He asked the council to wait for Planning Commission review, economic evidence and a city attorney opinion. Former council member Vanessa Demuth raised the idea of a recall. Others worried about ongoing rink costs, and about whether hockey serves enough families.

For: Nate Mulvihill and Cassie Korthauer talked about youth sports and kids playing on the same old fields their parents did. Jeremy Ballner said: "Listen, you get one. It's called an election." A RAHA parent said the current arena already pays its own way on user fees.

What Council and Staff Said Back

  • Legality: Staff said they relied on the city's bond attorney, whose opinion is in the meeting packet. The city attorney deferred to it.
  • Rink upkeep: The current rink gets $130,000 a year from taxes for big repairs. Schultz said new rinks would start lower, and he's working on partners and sponsors to offset costs.
  • Big donors: Large companies haven't offered $5 million to $15 million gifts. Flint Hills did donate 57 acres, worth about $6 million at the time.
  • Why now: Essler said a single rink was about $8 million in 2016, and two rinks now run $38 million to $39 million. He said waiting only costs more.
  • Data center: Kienberger called a second data center "completely false." (We covered the earlier second-site concerns here.)

The Bottom Line

The money tool is in place, but nothing is built and no loans are taken yet. The Planning Commission still has to confirm the plan matches Rosemount's comp plan. Each bond sale comes back for a vote. Staff promised open houses this fall and early winter. The city's Built to Play page has the project list. The financing law is Minn. Stat. 469.0813.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Rosemount just approve the ice arena design?

No. Designs are still concept drawings. The vote only sets up the borrowing tool.

Can the city borrow more than $75 million?

Not under this ordinance. $75 million is the cap, and the current estimate is about $69 million including fees.

Why use the Port Authority instead of a referendum?

Staff said Port Authority debt doesn't count against the city's debt limit and would sit outside any future state levy limits. Critics said it sidesteps voters, since parks referendums failed in 2016 and, one speaker said, in 2008.

What gets built first?

Schultz expects the full-size baseball field at UMore first, followed closely by the ice rinks.

Can I still give input?

Yes. Staff said more open houses are planned this fall and early winter, and residents can comment at council meetings.

Share this story

Now Booking

Dinner Club

We match you with 5 locals for a curated dinner out. You show up. We handle the rest.

$15.99 a seat. Your meal is separate.

Claim Your Seat

Stay in the Loop

Get the latest stories and events delivered to your inbox.

All Stories

Join 7,000+ local readers

The best stuff in the South Metro, in your inbox every Tuesday morning.